The non traditional approach to incarceration & Community supervision that includes community.
The Incarcerated Nation Credible Messenger Institute: (INCMI).
is a project of The Incarcerated Nation Network INC, a collective of post incarcerated leaders & Human Rights Defenders who work together to operate projects that support those directly impacted by mass incarceration. The Collective Network works to support justice impacted Youth through positive mentoring & advocacy. The Institute offers a multi-level course that trains youth to be trainers and work within the community as Young Adult Peer Providers that assist other justice impacted youth to resources & opportunities.
We believe in the power of Human Resilience as a catalyst to empower growth & change

1 in 3 Blk Boys Face Incarceration

650,000 NYPD Youth Arrests
“As a community of Directly Impacted Leaders & Credible Messengers we have to be the Moral Police of society”
-Keyonn Sheppard.
Incarcerated Nation Network INC) is a 501 3 © nonprofit Human Rights organization (INC) is a Human Rights Council of leaders who all operate organizations that serve those directly impacted, their families & community. Incarcerated Nation leaders make up International Councils that create collaborative projects that serve Youth as an alternative to Incarceration and provides a safe space where mentoring can happen for members returning from incarceration as well as youth who are given a second chance.
INC is a community based organization that is focused on practical solutions to the city’s most pressing social and economic challenges. The Council-members has a long-standing commitment to juvenile and criminal justice reform. The Collective holds regular educational events, lectures by leading thinkers, concerts and film screenings with directly Impacted panelists . This is often a source of income or returning citizens & their first step into the movement to educate from direct experience.
Incarcerated Nation works to educate the world around the conditions of confinement that millions of American’s live under and the collateral consequences of living post incarcerated in America. Through the belief in human resilience Incarcerated Nation creates a safe space for youth impacted by the justice system and advocates & organizes for a society in which all people Justice Impacted are treated equally.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person, no one shall be held in slavery or servitude and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all forms. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. INC stands by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights & our legal framework. INC provides services for returning citizens who are returning to working in the public health field. We believe that those directly impacted empowered to create change, then change themselves to better help others as peer navigators within the community,
Healed People, Heal People.
2000,000,000
The Amount we spend per year per person on Rikers island & NYC jails
40-50,000
the amount to house one youth in prison for one year
2,600
the amount one homeless youth cost the shelter system to house per month
231,000 Girls Incarcerated & Growing
Women’s Mass Incarceration:
The Whole Pie 2019 Tweet this
By Aleks Kajstura
October 29, 2019
Press release
With growing public attention to the problem of mass incarceration, people want to know about women’s experience with incarceration. How many women are held in prisons, jails, and other correctional facilities in the United States? And why are they there? How is their experience different from men’s? While these are important questions, finding those answers requires not only disentangling the country’s decentralized and overlapping criminal justice systems, but also unearthing the frustratingly hard to find and often altogether missing data on gender.
This report provides a detailed view of the 231,000 women and girls incarcerated in the United States, and how they fit into the even broader picture of correctional control. We pull together data from a number of government agencies and calculates the breakdown of women held by each correctional system by specific offense. The report, produced in collaboration with the ACLU’s Campaign for Smart Justice, answers the questions of why and where women are locked up:
pie chart showing the number of women locked up on a given day in the United States by facility type and the underlying offense using the newest data available in 2019
In stark contrast to the total incarcerated population, where the state prison systems hold twice as many people as are held in jails, more incarcerated women are held in jails than in state prisons. As we will explain, the outsized role of jails has serious consequences for incarcerated women and their families.
Women’s incarceration has grown at twice the pace of men’s incarceration in recent decades, and has disproportionately been located in local jails. The data needed to explain exactly what happened, when, and why does not yet exist, not least because the data on women has long been obscured by the larger scale of men’s incarceration. Frustratingly, even as this report is updated every year, it is not a direct tool for tracking changes in women’s incarceration over time because we are forced to rely on the limited sources available, which are neither updated regularly nor always compatible across years.
Particularly in light of the scarcity of gender-specific data, the disaggregated numbers presented here are an important step to ensuring that women are not left behind in the effort to end mass incarceration.
Jails loom large in women’s incarceration
A staggering number of women who are incarcerated are not even convicted: a quarter of women who are behind bars have not yet had a trial. Moreover, 60% of women in jails under local control have not been convicted of a crime and are awaiting trial.
Aside from women under local authority (or jurisdiction), state and federal agencies also pay local jails to house an additional 12,500 women. For example, ICE and the U.S. Marshals, which have fewer dedicated facilities for their detainees, contract with local jails to hold roughly 5,600 women. So, the number of women physically held in jails is even higher:
pie chart showing the number of women locked up on a given day in the United States by facility type and the underlying offense using the newest data available in 2019
Troublingly, the newest data available show that from 2016 to 2017, the number of women in jail on a given day grew by more than 5%, even as the rest of the jail population declined. Again, the shortage of timely, gender-specific data makes it impossible to explain this increase. It could be due to increases among women in arrests, pretrial detention, case processing times, punishment for probation or parole violations, or jail sentence lengths - or any combination of these factors. Of all these possible explanations, only arrest data are reported annually and by sex. And from 2016-2017, women’s arrests actually declined by 0.7%, so changes in arrests can’t explain all of the increase in the number of women in jail that year. Ultimately, we need more data to fully explain what’s behind the recent growth in women’s jail populations.
Women are disproportionately stuck in jails
Avoiding pre-trial incarceration is uniquely challenging for women. The number of unconvicted women stuck in jail is surely not because courts are considering women to be a flight risk, particularly when they are generally the primary caregivers of children. The far more likely answer is that incarcerated women, who have lower incomes than incarcerated men, have an even harder time affording money bail. When the typical bail amounts to a full year’s income for women, it’s no wonder that women are stuck in jail awaiting trial.
Even once convicted, the system funnels women into jails: About a quarter of convicted incarcerated women are held in jails, compared to about 10% of all people incarcerated with a conviction.
So, what does it mean that large numbers of women are held in jail — for them, and for their families? While stays in jail are generally shorter than in stays in prison, jails make it harder to stay in touch with family than prisons do. Jail phone calls are three times as expensive as calls from prison, and other forms of communication are more restricted — some jails don’t even allow real letters, limiting mail to postcards. This is especially troubling given that 80% of women in jails are mothers, and most of them are primary caretakers of their children. Thus children are particularly susceptible to the domino effect of burdens placed on incarcerated women.
Women in jails are also more likely to suffer from mental health problems and experience serious psychological distress than either women in prisons or men in either correctional setting. Compounding the problem, jails are particularly poorly positioned to provide proper mental health care. (Though that is certainly not to say that prisons are always better at meeting women’s needs.)
Ending mass incarceration requires looking at all offenses — and all women
The numbers revealed by this report enable a national conversation about policies that impact women incarcerated by different government agencies and in different types of facilities. These figures also serve as the foundation for reforming the policies that lead to incarcerating women in the first place.
Too often, the conversation about criminal justice reform starts and stops with the question of non-violent drug and property offenses. While drug and property offenses make up more than half of the offenses for which women are incarcerated, the chart reveals that all offenses — including the violent offenses that account for roughly a quarter of all incarcerated women — must be considered in the effort to reduce the number of incarcerated women in this country. This new data on women underlines the need for reform discussions to focus not just on the easier choices but on the policy changes that will have the most impact.
Furthermore, even among women, incarceration is not indiscriminate and reforms should address the disparities related to LBTQ status and race as well. A recent study revealed that a third of incarcerated women identify as lesbian or bisexual, compared to less than 10% of men. The same study found that lesbian and bisexual women are likely to receive longer sentences than their heterosexual peers.
And although the data do not exist to break down the “whole pie” by race or ethnicity, overall Black and American Indian women are markedly overrepresented in prisons and jails: Incarcerated women are 53% White, 29% Black, 14% Hispanic, 2.5% American Indian and Alaskan Native, 0.9% Asian, and 0.4% Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander. While we are a long way away from having data on intersectional impacts of sexuality and race or ethnicity on women’s likelihood of incarceration, it is clear that Black and lesbian or bisexual women are disproportionately subject to incarceration.
Additionally, a recent Prison Policy Initiative analysis found significant racial disparities in arrest rates for women (but not men) in police-initiated traffic and street stops. Women have not benefited equally from police reforms — since 1980, men’s arrest rates have fallen by 30%, but women’s arrest rates have barely budged. The upward trajectory of women’s incarceration is undoubtedly reinforced by policing practices.
Mass incarceration targets girls
a slice of pie chart showing the offense types for the 6,600 girls confined in youth facilities
Of the girls confined in youth facilities, nearly 10% are held for status offenses, such as “running away, truancy, and incorrigibility”. Among boys, such offenses account for less than 3% of their confined population. These statistics are particularly troubling because status offenses tend to be simply responses to abuse.
As is the case with women, girls of color and those who identify as LBTQ are disproportionately confined in juvenile facilities. Black girls account for 35% of the confined girls population, and Latina girls account for another 19%, while white girls are only 38% of those locked up. And while LBTQ women are also disproportionately represented in the adult correctional systems, a staggering 40% of girls in the juvenile justice system are lesbian, bisexual, or questioning and gender non-conforming. (The comparable statistic for boys is just under 14%.)
While society and the justice systems subject all girls to stricter codes of conduct than is expected of their male peers, Black girls in particular shoulder an added burden of adultification — being perceived as older, more culpable, and more responsible than their peers — which leads to greater contact with and harsher consequences within the juvenile justice system.
The tentacles of mass incarceration have a long reach
Even the “Whole Pie” of incarceration above represents just one small portion (19%) of the women under correctional supervision, which includes over a million women on probation and parole. Again, this is in stark contrast to the total correctional population (mostly men), where a third of all people under correctional control are in prisons and jails.
pie chart showing that of women under correctional control, showing the relative percentage of incarcerated women, to women on parole, and on probationThree out of four women under control of any U.S. correctional system are on probation. Probation is often billed as an alternative to incarceration, but instead it is frequently set with unrealistic conditions that undermine its goal of keeping people from being locked up. For example, probation often comes with steep fees, which, like bail, women are in the worst position to afford. Failing to pay these probation fees is often a violation of probation. Childcare duties further complicate probation requirements that often include meetings with probation officers, especially for women with no extra money to spend on babysitters or reliable transportation across town.
Almost 2 million women and girls are released from prisons and jails every year, but few post-release programs are available to them — partly because so many women are confined to jails, which are not meant to be used for long-term incarceration. It is perhaps then no surprise that formerly incarcerated women are also more likely to be homeless than formerly incarcerated men, making reentry and compliance with probation or parole even more difficult. All of these issues make women particularly vulnerable to being incarcerated not because they commit crimes, but because they run afoul of one of the burdensome obligations of their probation or parole supervision.
The picture of women’s incarceration is far from complete, and many questions remain about mass incarceration’s unique impact on women. This report offers the critical estimate that a quarter of all incarcerated women are unconvicted. But — since the federal government hasn’t collected the key underlying data in a decade — is that number growing? And how do the harms of that unnecessary incarceration intersect with women’s disproportionate caregiving to impact families? Beyond these big picture questions, there are a plethora of detailed data points that are not reported for women by any government agencies, such as the simple number of women incarcerated in U.S. Territories or involuntarily committed to state psychiatric hospitals because of justice system involvement.
While more data is needed, the data in this report lends focus and perspective to the policy reforms needed to end mass incarceration without leaving women behind.
About the data
This briefing uses the most recent data available on the number of people in various types of facilities and the most significant charge or conviction. Because not all types of data are collected each year, we sometimes had to combine differing data sets; for example, we applied the percentage distribution of offense types from the previous year to the current year’s total count data. To smooth out these differing levels of vintage and precision among the sources, we choose to round all figures in the graphic. This process may, however, result in various parts not adding up precisely to the total.
Jails: Calculated based on the Bureau of Justice Statistics, Jail Inmates in 2017, Table 3 (year-end 2017). The Bureau of Justice Statistics has stopped collecting data on the conviction status of women in jails in 2009, so we calculated the breakdown based on 2009 data published in the Jail Inmates at Midyear 2013 - Statistical Tables. Our analysis of offense types is based on the Survey Of Inmates In Local Jails, 2002. See below and Who is in jail? Deep dive for why we used our own analysis rather than the otherwise excellent Bureau of Justice Statistics analysis of the same dataset, Profiles of Jail Inmates, 2002. While this methodology section illustrates the pervasive dearth of women’s criminal justice data, this 2002 data continues to be the most recent data available of its kind without regard to gender breakdown. (The Bureau of Justice Statistics was scheduled to start administering the next Survey of Inmates in Local Jails in 2018, but is now re-scheduled to 2021.) Note that the populations reported by BJS are not compatible with years reported by BJS because the agency switched reporting mid-year populations to year-end populations. (Because of seasonal cycles, year-end jail populations tend to be lower than those at mid-year.)
Immigration detention: The number of women in immigration detention, and what facilities they are held, in comes from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University, which aggregated individual records of people held by ICE.
Federal: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2017, Table 14, reports percentage breakdown of offense types for the convicted population as of September 30, 2017, and the total population of women reported in Table 2, for December 31, 2017. We applied the offense types to the convicted population, but data does not exist for a good estimate of offense types for pre-trial women under Federal control. We also attributed women held by the U.S. Marshal Service in state and local facilities to the Federal slice, see the “data definitions and clarifications” section below for details.
State Prisons: Prisoners in 2017, Table 2 provides the gender breakdown for the total population as of December 31st, 2017, and Table 12 provides data (as of December 31, 2016) that we used to calculate the ratio of different offense types.
Military: The latest gender breakdown we could find was in Correctional Populations in the United States, 1998, Table 8.5, which reported the number of prisoners under military jurisdiction, by officer and enlisted status, gender, race, and Hispanic origin, for December 31, 1998. We calculated the number of women for our military slice by imputing the percentages from 1998 to the numbers reported in Prisoners in 2017, Table 18, which gives the number of people incarcerated in by each branch of the military, but does not provide a gender breakdown.
Territorial Prisons (correctional facilities in the U.S. Territories of American Samoa, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and U.S. Commonwealths of Northern Mariana Islands and Puerto Rico): Calculated based on World Prison Brief data reporting the most recent data available (2017 for every territory but Virgin Islands, which was 2013).
Youth: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement, reporting data for 2017. I defined “youth confinement” to include all justice placements outside of the home. This methodology better reflects the realities of justice confinement for youth and brings us closer to showing the full scope of confinement for all people in the U.S. The inclusion of these less restrictive forms of confinement for youth is consistent with our approach for the adult system which includes the (admittedly far less numerous) halfway houses and other forms of community confinement as a part of the entire adult system.
Civil Commitment (At least 20 states and the federal government operate facilities for the purposes of detaining people convicted of sexual crimes after their sentences are complete. These facilities and the confinement there are technically civil, but in reality are quite like prisons. People under civil commitment are held in custody continuously from the time they start serving their sentence at a correctional facility through their confinement in the civil facility.): The Sex Offender Civil Commitment Programs Network conducts an annual survey, and the civil commitment data came from an email with SOCCPN President Shan Jumper on September 27, 2019, estimating that there were 7 women total, nationally (based on the SOCCPN 2019 Annual Survey). And according to the Common Questions about Civil Commitment as a Sexually Violent Person (Adopted by the ATSA and the Sex Offender Civil Commitment Programs Network Executive Boards of Directors on October 13, 2015), there are “a few women throughout the country who have been committed.”
Indian Country (correctional facilities operated by tribal authorities or the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Indian Affairs): Bureau of Justice Statistics’ Jails in Indian Country, 2016, Table 5, reporting data for midyear, 2016.
Probation and Parole: Our counts of women incarcerated and under community supervision are calculated from Correctional Populations in the United States, 2015, Appendix Table 3, reporting populations under correctional control by sex for December 31, 2015, and newer 2016 counts from Correctional Populations in the United States, 2016, which no longer has a breakdown for women. We applied the 2015 sex ratios to the 2016 counts in Table 1 to calculate the number of women under community supervision. In order to break out community supervision between Probation and Parole, we used Probation and Parole in the United States, 2016 for the percentage of women in the Parole and Probation population. (Appendix Table 5 for Parole and Appendix Table 2 for Probation) and applied that ratio to the totals reported in CSAT (these numbers are the numbers that appear, rounded, in table 1 of CPUS). We then adjusted those numbers to ensure that people with multiple statuses were counted only once in their most restrictive category. (Because gender-specific data on people with more than one correctional status was not available, we reduced the number of women on probation and on parole by the ratio (3.54% for parole and 1.64% for probation) we used for Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2017). For readers interested in knowing the total number of women on parole and probation, ignoring any double-counting with other forms of correctional control, there are 113,700 women on parole and 918,300 women on probation.
Several data definitions and clarifications may be helpful to researchers reusing this data in new ways:
To avoid double-counting women held in local jails on behalf of the Bureau of Prisons, ICE, U.S. Marshals Service, state, and other prison authorities from being counted twice, we removed the 11,793 women from the jail population reported by the BJS and from the numbers we used to calculate the number of convicted women in local jails. Our calculation for the number of women held in such arrangements was based on data reported for the total number of people held in jails for federal and state authorities in Table 17 of Prisoners in 2017 and the 2002 Survey Of Inmates In Local Jails, where our analysis showed that about 8.5% of those held in such arrangements were women, and the total number of women held jails for ICE from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University (using the number of women found in facilities owned by counties, cities, and municipalities).
Because we removed ICE detainees and people under the jurisdiction of federal and state authorities from the jail population, we had to recalculate the offense distribution reported in Survey Of Inmates In Local Jails, 2002 who were “convicted” or “not convicted” without the people who reported that they were being held on behalf of state authorities, the Federal Bureau of Prisons or U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Our definition of “convicted” was those who reported that they were “To serve a sentence in this jail,” “To await sentencing for an offense,” or “To await transfer to serve a sentence somewhere else”. Our definition of not convicted was “To stand trial for an offense,” “To await arraignment,” or “To await a hearing for revocation of probation/parole or community release”.
We also accounted for women held in federal pre-trial detention who are confined in facilities other than federal and state prisons. We found 3,217 women held by, or for, the U.S. Marshals Service. Census of Jails: Population Changes, 1999-2013 Table 13 reports that 848 women are in Federal Bureau of Prisons detention centers and we estimate that another 688 are in private facilities contracted out to the U.S. Marshals Service. We calculated another 1,681 women in state and local facilities based on figures reported by the U.S. Marshals Service in their Prisoner Operations 2019 Fact Sheet, disaggregated for women based on gender breakdown found in the 2002 Survey of Jail Inmates, and facility type breakdown in the total Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2019. We included these 3,217 women total in the Federal Prisons slice of the pie.
Additionally, a significant portion of the jail population is not in fact under local jurisdiction, but is in a local jail under contract with the U.S. Marshals Service. This population, discussed above, consists both of people who are awaiting trial, and those who are convicted but have not yet been sentenced, so they appear in both the convicted and unconvicted local jail slices. This is part of why, for example, the pie chart shows 133 women “serving” sentences in jails for murder when murder is typically an offense that warrants much longer sentences than would be served in a jail. We have not yet developed a way to separately identify and describe this population, let alone disentangle which portion of the reported numbers is women. We hope to, in future versions of this report, develop more detailed ways to display and describe this population.
Lastly, the youth slice does not include 333 girls held in adult jails and prisons. There are 300 girls under the age of 17 held in local jails (reported in Table 3 of Bureau of Justice Statistics Jail Inmates in 2017), and 33 girls under the age of 18 held in state or federal prisons (as reported by the Bureau of Justice Statistics Quick Table, Reported number of female inmates age 17 or younger held in custody in federal or state prisons [XLS], December 31, 2000-2016).
Read the entire methodology
Footnotes
This is most powerfully illustrated in our work comparing individual states’ incarceration rates to other countries. See also the underlying data. ↩
For example, our report The Gender Divide: Tracking Women’s State Prison Growth covers the effects of reform on women in prisons and the Vera Institute of Justice covers women in jails in their report, Overlooked: Women and Jails in an Era of Reform. ↩
Readers comparing last year’s edition of this report to this one will notice a much larger apparent increase in the number of women in local jails. This is because in 2017, the BJS counted the jail populations at midyear (the end of June), whereas for the previous two years, it used the yearend counts, and there is a significant amount of seasonal variation in jail populations. Jail populations are typically higher in the summer than winter. The BJS adjusted its estimates for 2015 and 2016 to account for seasonal variation and make year-to-year comparisons possible. For both years, the difference among women between the previously published yearend populations and the new adjusted midyear populations was about 5%, or about 5,000 women. The 5% increase we refer to in the text was calculated using the updated, seasonally-adjusted estimates. ↩
However, there was a significant increase (7.6%) in the number of arrests for drug offenses among women that year. It’s possible that these cases influenced other factors and therefore indirectly help explain the jail growth among women. For example, some of these drug arrests could have led to revocations of women’s probation or parole, landing them in jail. The possibility that more probation or parole violations could explain some of the jail growth among women is particularly compelling, considering that justice-involved women are disproportionately likely to be under community supervision compared to men. Furthermore, it appears that probation failures are up overall (gender-specific data are not available). Other data from BJS shows that absconders and people discharged from probation for “other” unsatisfactory reasons have increased over the past few years, even as the total number of people exiting from probation has been trending downward. ↩
Our research found that women who could not make bail had an annual median income of just $11,071. And among those women, Black women had a median annual income of only $9,083 (just 20% that of a white non-incarcerated man). When the typical $10,000 bail amounts to a full year’s income, it’s no wonder that women are stuck in jail awaiting trial. ↩
As we’ve written, recent studies specifically looking at pretrial confinement confirm that women’s inability to afford bail has a particularly high impact on families. ↩
A gender analysis of the Bureau of Justice Statistics’ Indicators of Mental Health Problems Reported by Prisoners and Jail Inmates 2011-12 report is available in the blog post New government report points to continuing mental health crisis in prisons and jails. And for anyone still unsure of the harms of jail, just look at the suicide rates in U.S. jails. ↩
A recent study based on the National Inmate Survey found that 42.1% of women in prison 35.7% of women in jail are sexual minorities, compared to 9.3% of men in prison, 6.2% of men in jail. The study also confirmed that “[t]here is disproportionate incarceration, mistreatment, harsh punishment, and sexual victimization of sexual minority inmates.” ↩
The women’s incarcerated population has a different race and ethnicity breakdown than the total U.S. population and total incarcerated population. ↩
These disparities don’t stop at incarceration. Even once released, women are at higher risk for homelessness and unemployment, with Black women being hit hardest. ↩
Data show that white women were about half as likely as white men to be arrested during a stop, but Black women were at least as likely as white men to be arrested. Black women were arrested in 4.4 percent of police-initiated stops, which was roughly three times as often as white women (1.5 percent), and twice as often as Latinas (2.2 percent). For more analysis of policing data, see our analysis in Policing Women: Race and gender disparities in police stops, searches, and use of force. ↩
Probation also varies wildly between states. ↩
Reporting from the New York Times, Probation May Sound Light, but Punishments Can Land Hard, captures the typical cascading fees and conditions while following one woman’s navigation of probation. ↩
See all of the footnotes
Acknowledgements
This report was made possible by the partnership of the ACLU Campaign for Smart Justice, the support of Public Welfare Foundation and the MacArthur Foundation’s Safety and Justice Challenge, and all of the donors, researchers, programmers and designers who helped the Prison Policy Initiative develop the Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie series of reports.
About the author
Aleks Kajstura is Legal Director of the Prison Policy Initiative. Her previous publications on women’s incarceration include States of Women’s Incarceration: The Global Context, which compares the rate of women’s incarceration in every U.S. state to 166 independent countries.
About the Prison Policy Initiative
The non-profit non-partisan Prison Policy Initiative was founded in 2001 to expose the broader harm of mass criminalization and spark advocacy campaigns to create a more just society. The organization is most well-known for its big-picture publication Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie that helps the public more fully engage in criminal justice reform.
Creative Commons License
This report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Youth Need a Platform for Their Voices
INCMI is a Nonprofit 501 3 C alternative to incarceration program providing post incarceration redirection to young adults & community members who are directly impacted by the justice system.
Incarcerated Nation Credible Messenger Institute (INCMI)
is a dynamic certified, training program focused on the development of credible messengers working in the public health-social services fields throughout the Nation, creating community based solutions to incarceration & community supervision mentoring. This training program is uniquely taught & created by those directly impacted building on top of the decades old studies & research of The NYS Nontraditional approach to Rehabilitation Think Tank.
increase of School Arrests
INCMI mission is combat mass incarceration through Trauma informed care practices that produce healed people who work to heal other people directly impacted. This system of community healing is what is needed to combat over 400 years of oppression and generational trauma that ills entire marginalized neighborhoods.

Black Youth are the top Description of NYPD stops
“Far too often within marginalized communities we understand how Hurt People- Hurt People, we believe & teach -Healed people Heal People”
-Five Mualimm-ak President/CEO of INC.
New York City is increasingly employing credible messengers to engage young adults involved in the juvenile and criminal justice systems. These programs serve thousands of young people through youth justice, violence interruption, and after-school programs. For the programs to be . and norm-changing, they must provide alternatives and opportunities for both participants and credible messenger staff for lawful, gainful employment and support to build productive and healthy lives for themselves and their families. Credible messengers are hired to stand in harm’s way in the streets and act as agents of change in young people’s lives. They also become staff at human services agencies and must adapt to an entirely different set of norms
The Institute was developed in partnership with social service employers and responds to the need for more than professional development to support post incarcerated survivors of trauma. more the classroom training’s, this course allows for post incarceration redirection of directly impacted returning citizens and support for this vital workforce. Credible messengers help make communities safer and reduce incarceration. NYC Mayor De Blasio has recognized their impact on reducing gun violence and a new evaluation from the Urban Institute and the Department of Probation shows a 57% decrease in convictions among young people working with credible messenger mentors. ***Quoted from the Institute for Transformative Mentoring at The New School
We live in a nation that spends over 8 Billion US Dollars incarcerating KIDS. In New York City there are record numbers of young adults under correctional control & community supervision leading all of the city’s district attorneys to sign on to the Less is more act calling for reform. The expansion of more credible messengers is needed to fill the gaps of community services & resources.
Organization
INCMI pedagogy is rooted in using restorative justice practices and interactive learning to support participants in engaging deeply with the material and each other. The college-level course covers trauma-informed care, youth development, history of mass incarceration and a social justice framework, and career advancement support. Students engage in activities, role play exercises, and develop lesson plans and strategies that they use in their daily work with young people while navigating them to health services. Each member is trained in preventive services, CPR, and lifesaving skills that are needed within the community when employed as peer navigators. (Public Health Credible Messenger)Peer Navigators that will assist their neighborhood districts to increase the healthy solutions & resources that lead to a reduction of violence. .
The Incarcerated Nation Credible Messenger Institute INCMI is a network of Human Rights Defenders, Youth justice organizations, Religious leaders, post incarcerated leaders, organizations, businesses, educational institutions, disability professionals, community based organizations & legislative supporters, Credible Messengers & private donors all collaboratively working toward public health solutions to end violence & increase community health levels.
Founded by Five Mualimmak Co-founder of the Incarcerated Nation, Pastor Keyon Sheppard of ITM at the new School -Joseph” Jazz ‘Hayden Campaign To End The New Jim Crow- Colby Ann Thompson national Council of formally Incarcerated Women & Girlsalongside graduates of ITM New School, the sanctuary institute, ART, AVP in collaboration with the NYS Campaign to End the New Jim Crow and the NYS Nontraditional Think Tank. The Himalayan Institute, using restorative justice practices and interactive learning to support participants in engaging deeply with the material and each other.
The college-level course covers trauma-informed care, youth development, history of mass incarceration and a social justice framework, and career advancement. Students engage in activities, role play exercises, and develop lesson plans and strategies that they use in their daily work with young people. These trauma informed training’s and workshops will not only absorb community service hours for the participants but additionally train ready willing and able justice impacted youth & community members to be prepared for employment as Credible Messengers
Target Population
Credible Messenger mentors serve young people citywide (with a focus on high-poverty, justice involved areas such as the South Bronx, Harlem, Central Brooklyn, and Jamaica). Participating and expected students are employed by Credible Messenger organizations such as : organizations including: Artistic Noise, Bronx Defenders, Brownsville Think Tank Matters, Center for Court Innovation, Center for Employment Opportunities, Child Welfare Organizing Project, Children’s Village, Community Connections for Youth, Exodus, Family Life Center – Tru 2 Life, Friends of Island Academy, GMACC, Good Shepherd Services, Incarcerated Nation Corp., KAVI, LifeCamp, Man Up!, New York Association of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, NYC Civic Corps, Osborne Association, Phipps, Release the Grip, Sheltering Arms, Strive, and Young New Yorkers. Students range in age from 18 to over 60. Students identify majority as people of color or Latino. Students draw on life experiences from poverty, trauma, incarceration, gangs, surviving gun violence and interpersonal violence, and the child welfare system. I
INCMI is also contracted to facilitate workshops to various state, federal & city agencies, to best assist them with working with the directly impacted population. These groups all cover violence on a personal interaction level, INCMI organizes to help community members heal from the root causes of violence, by treating the underlined issues that cause violence to impact a healthy positive life. INCMI engages Credible Messengers on different levels and offers training for all forms of mentors to become more competent about Violence as a public health risk. Young Adults need support and alternatives to incarceration that provide economic solutions to combat the growing rate of youth death & violence. INCMI believe in grounding our restorative justice training within the community, we began by developing the first accredited professional development train the trainer model with ITM at The New School, from there graduates created a complete system of support for mentors and activists who are post incarcerated as well as from the community. True community healing takes all-inclusive healing.
INCMI offers a Youth Built version of the course during the beginning of the summer for Young Adults who are mentee’s in the projects we serve and interested in becoming peer mentors called the Young Adult Perspective Project (YAPP). Students from the professional and young adult programs also participate in workshops, film screenings and policy events that are designed to help build a professional network and a base for collective ongoing criminal justice change organizing efforts.
They are supported by assigned mentors who work to provide case management to justice impacted youth to achieve their goals of continued education & professional development. YAPP offers various levels of career paths for Young Adults and retains members who work to train Young Adult Peer Providers across NYS through alternative to incarceration Academies that provide mentoring & support with Credible Messenger mentors.
Our firm belief in Human Resilience shapes our program operations and participant engagement that are strengthened when youth and front-line staff play a role in programmatic decision-making.
We utilize risk and needs assessments that are valuable tools to tailor services and guide individual case management.
We provide services to participating youth’s family members helps to stabilize their home lives and support success in programs.
We insist on Investments in staff professional development, technical assistance, and cross-site collaboration to enhance service delivery, but additional training and resources are needed to support data collection and monitoring.
we focus on post incarcerated leaders first, far too often those most marginalize are further discriminated in the workforce, we pride ourselves in prioritizing directly impacted persons first.
Credible Messengers Decrease Youth Recidivism by Over 50%
Incarcerated Nation-C.M.I
NYC Mentoring Reduces Reconviction by 2/3
we Believe in Healed People Heal People
Young Adults credit the experience with helping them to develop a support network, heal, recognize their strengths, and develop a greater sense of their capacity to give back to their communities. Several students reported improved interpersonal relationships and a young woman remarked that the program made her “a better mother as well as professional mentor to young adults” Our early outcomes from our first cohort of Young Adults were all released from probation early, additionally they were awarded continued education at Harlem Clemente & Columbia Justice in Education Scholarships. The Majority of the Generation Summer 2 cohort were appointed to the NYS Governors Raise the Age Task Force, Work as Young Adult Credible Messengers with CPNYC, Young New Yorkers and were trained with the Youth Speakers Institute & Youth Represent as well as the Raise the Age NY campaign.
INCMI has a unique training program for Young Adults called the Young Adult Perspective Project (YAPP). INCMI members remain on as mentors until employed to work in the field INCMI members are employed to provide community support and be visible deterrents of violence while addressing their root causes with the community. A credible messenger mentor supports young adults in a lifetime contract that expands well past college placement & stable employment. INCMI is a project of Incarcerated Nation Network that trains and employs Young Adult Peer Providers through the YAPProject. These training’s prepare young adults for work in the public health fields as Young Adult Peer Providers.– Young Adult Perspective Project (YAPP) is a multi-platform production company made up of all directly impacted Young Adult Credible Messengers who are appointed to several progressive youth boards. YAPP trains Young Adult Peer Providers as well as services for young adults surviving under community supervision & correctional control.
incmi
More details about Incarcerated Nation Credible Messenger Institute
More details on our about our belief in human RESILIENCE & how healed People, Heal People
Support Human Rights.
All donations are Tax deductible to the maximum amount allowed.
INCMI Core pedagogy is Rooted in our belief in Human Resilience.
Healed People-Heal People.
Understanding our Pedagogy
Restorative practices is a field of study that has the potential to positively influence human behavior and strengthen civil society around the world. Restorative practices builds healthy communities, increases social capital, reduces the impact of crime, decreases antisocial behavior, repairs harm and restores relationships INCMI pedagogy is rooted in using restorative justice practices and interactive learning to support participants in engaging deeply with the material and each other. The college-level course covers trauma-informed care, youth development, history of mass incarceration and a social justice framework, and career advancement. Students engage in activities, role play exercises, and develop lesson plans and strategies that they use in their daily work with young people while navigating them to health services. Each member is trained in preventive services, CPR, and lifesaving skills that are needed within the community when employed as peer navigators. (Public Health Credible Messenger)Peer Navigators that will assist their neighborhood districts to increase the healthy solutions & resources that lead to a reduction of violence. We utilize the mental health tool kit provided by our partners Department of Mental Health & Hygiene. (DOMH&H) and the NYS Department of Health.
INCMI core 1000 course
THE FIRST 16 WEEKS OF TRAINING INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
Unit 1: Principles of Restorative Practices
The curriculum starts with an in-depth training on Restorative Practices. In this first section, students will learn to utilize these principles as they build group cohesion and begin the process of healing. Most have belonged to community organizations that provide this historical content of restorative justice. Often demonized by capitalistic influence these lessons derive from a community based norms of survival & identity. Students will learn about oral story-telling using their own life experiences as a pedagogical narrative. This sharing enhances rapport-building and connectedness and lays the foundation for the idea that credible messengers can foster positive transformation in others through a critical understanding of their own lived experience. This section will require students to write their stories which will help them develop their communication skills. They will also learn how to create lesson plans and lead activities that create group cohesion among the youth they serve. This unit will conclude with a three-day retreat where mentors continue to learn skills, where Credible Messengers will continue to develop their problem-solving skills and learn activities that they can use at their agencies to foster group cohesion.
Unit 2: Foundations of Healing
Many Credible Messengers have undergone the abuses of the justice system in addition to having experienced significant trauma from early childhood into adulthood. Healing is essential. In this section, students will explore how prior ordeals influence their present behaviors and how healing is critical to recovery and leading a healthier, more productive life. The goal in educating Credible Messengers in the principles and practices of mental health and wellbeing, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), & trauma-informed care, is to help them become healthier so they can be a strong, reliable resource for the youth they mentor. This section takes mentors through a journey of youth centered incarceration and what can be done to expel these norms.
3: Understanding Historical Trauma
Understanding the history of current policy and practices of mass incarceration in the U.S. is essential for Credible Messengers in grasping how the dominant culture has criminalized and traumatized them. This gives them the critical framework to be effective advocates for their mentees and become people who are part of the movement that create alternatives to imprisonment. We will also study the history of social justice movements in the U.S. and explore ideas about how to further the alternative to incarceration movement that is being led by post incarcerated leaders who possess direct experience. In this section Credible Messengers will learn critical thinking skills, and criminal justice advocacy.
Unit 4 Foundations for Youth workforce development
This section will provide opportunities for students to demonstrate the skills they’ve gained from the course and shift the focus from their own healing to how they work with young people. This section covers the core tenets of youth development and working with young adults. Participants will also discuss adolescent brain research and how this understanding of how young people make decisions, evaluate risks and rewards, and relate to peers and others can help them work with young people and to appreciate their own personal development through the creation of trauma informed academies & internships that last the span of traditional incarceration sentencing allows the programs to be impactful as alternatives. This unit will include principles of case management and a review of motivational interviewing and other engagement strategies. Participants will work in small groups to design a lesson plan based on a need or skillset they have identified as necessary for their peers or mentees. They will conduct research, gather resources and develop a lesson plan. Participants will present their plans at the final Circle Session.
Unit 5: Workforce Readiness
This section will also cover employment related topics, such as presentation, identifying personal skills and attributes, employer expectations, and job interviewing and career planning. INCMI has developed a 37 part job reediness training class , youth once certified in this training can be contracted to provide this workshop to other young adults and programs in need of professional development post-employment It will also encourage participants to consider the mission and culture of their organization, and provide coaching in communicating and working with supervisors. INCMI has several Academies that youth can seek further specific training for employment & support. (see page 10)
Healed People, Heal People
Healed People, Heal People ,We see the main focus of the INCMI program as training students in trauma-informed care. We believe the best way to do this is to engage in our own healing process. In this section, credible messengers are recognized as and referred to as healers. As young adults we refer to them as Peer Providers. We begin by taking the restorative practices framework and combine it with lesson plans we adapted from research done by psychologists Kenneth Hardy and Tracey Laszloffy, we combine these principles with the Non Traditional approach developed by the Black Panthers & other CBO groups during the civil rights era. These practices are based in cultural beliefs put into practice. Peer mentoring has been the greatest tool within the work of abstaining substance abuse, these peer mentors only work if they have direct experience that empowers them to view life from the lens of the impacted person they work to support.
These very points is what drives our Peer Provider programs to success. We believe trauma can lead to violence. We see by engaging healers in their own healing process we in turn are helping mentees heal from past trauma. When mentees heal we reduce violence, recidivism, and improve quality of life for the young people we serve. These core concepts of Devaluation, Erosion of Community, Dehumanized loss and Rage are first introduced in the course as tools for participants to better understand themselves and their experiences. These same concepts are then used by credible messenger mentors in working with others. The most extreme human abnormality we believe is violence. “Violence involves a willful action (or inaction) that results in the intentional infliction of harm or injury” (Kenneth V. Hardy). When human behavior produces violence to ourselves or others, we have lost our humanity.
We see violence as permeating our society - poverty, war, genocide, slavery, mass incarceration, suicide, racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia are all acts of violence. These forms of violence harm not only our bodies but also our emotional and psychological well-being. Given, that most Credible Messengers are from impoverished backgrounds, are people of color and have been incarcerated, they have likely experienced multiple forms of violence and thus trauma. Following psychologists and authors of Teens Who Hurt, Kenneth V. Hardy and Tracey A. Laszloffy, we examine factors that lead people to violence. In Teens Who Hurt, Hardy and Laszloffy identify four aggravating factors contributing to violent behavior: Devaluation; Erosion of Community; Dehumanized Loss and; Rage. Devaluation occurs when an individual or group’s dignity and worth are assaulted or denigrated. Erosion of community occurs when someone has no place where they feel they can belong or feel connected to others in a meaningful way and nowhere that they feel safe and secure. Dehumanized loss occurs when a person has unacknowledged, unmourned and thus unhealed loss.
Rage isn’t just violent expressions of anger; rage is a normal human response to feelings of injustice, and the better our understanding is of rage, the better we are equipped to reduce acts of violence.
Erosion of Community
Community can be defined in many ways. We believe community is where people feel a sense of belonging and connection with others in a special way. It is where people learn who they are and develop a sense of identity, their place in the world. Somewhere people feel safe and comforted. A strong community teaches people how to care for others and negotiate complex human relationships. A strong sense of community can buffer one from devaluation. Those with disabilities may not easily have access to community to buffer the devaluation they experience whereas able-bodied people of color can come together and feel pride and positive affirmation. To be alienated from community, is to be alienated from one’s humanity. How does this alienation happen?
Community can be divided into three levels, primary community, extended community and cultural community. Disruption in any of these can cause trauma. Your primary community is generally understood as your immediate family: guardians, parents, siblings. When parents physically and sexually abuse their children, it is a devastating form of abuse because it disrupts the primary community of family and increases the likelihood of violence. Neglecting children can also cause such disruption of primary community. Divorce, separation and death can also disrupt a child’s primary community. One’s extended community includes one’s neighborhood or town, schools, houses of worship, community centers, etc. Disruption of ones extended community can occur because of harsh economic conditions, poor schools, war, mass violence, natural disasters, bullying and social ostracism. One’s cultural community can be disrupted by racism, sexism, class-ism, able-ism, homophobia, Islamophobia etc. It is critical that all these levels of community and any potential disruptions be understood by healers in order to effectively work with our men-tees.
Dehumanization of Loss
Unacknowledged, unmourned, unhealed loss is the third aggravating factor for violence. When people do not mourn their losses, they lose a part of their humanity. Loss can be understood both as tangible loss and intangible loss. Tangible loss is generally understood as the loss of something or someone physical. Intangible loss includes loss of respect, dignity, hope, voice/agency, etc. Young adults today experience the highest levels of unhealed trauma from death & violence than any other generation before. There are more people of color incarcerated then there was slaves in the 1800’s. with 80% of poor communities living with a family member who is incarcerated loss is imminent within this population. One should examine and explore what types of losses your men-tees suffers from.
Common losses that are important to be aware of include loss of a hero. Losing someone you idealize either because of death or shame cannot be minimized; it can be a critical aspect of one’s sense of community. Loss of a romantic partner can significantly impact adults and its need to be taken even more seriously with adolescents. Remember it can be their first experience in loving someone outside of their immediate family.
Divorce even when done with the child’s needs recognized can still create a sense of loss. It is critical to allow the child to mourn the loss of the family they once knew. Death has a finality which comes with much loss. A funeral may not be sufficient, especially for a child to mourn a loved-one’s death. Neglect also causes feelings that go unacknowledged and trauma ensures. 17 Loss of physical safety is common for youth in urban areas damaged by poverty and violence. Sometimes a house-fire or burglary can cause a loss of physical safety among children and adolescents. Other forms of loss to notice include loss created by moving, loss of friendship, and loss of economic security. It is also important to note that losing physical abilities can be particularly devastating, especially if a person got most of their positive affirmation from the now diminished or absent ability
Rage
‘Rage is a justifiable emotion “- Saj Rahman - Director of ITM at The New School Rage is something we all have come to fear. Rage is often seen as synonymous with violence. While suppressed anger can be the cause of rage, suppression of rage is what actually leads to violence. Rage is experienced when one feels great injustice and seeks revenge as an act of justice for the original harm. Rage is a righteous emotion. Anger is immediate, rage builds over time with devaluation, disruption of community, and dehumanization of loss. It is easy to identify explosive, externally directed rage which is evident through yelling, breaking things, and physical violence.
Silent, externally directed rage may require longer to identify as it requires more trust and relationship development, allowing for the free expression of violent ideation. Pay closer attention to loners or social outcasts as they experience devaluation and erosion of community, it may be critical to find pathways to re-channel their rage. Silent internally directed rage can be seen by bruises, cuts and often other physical markers on the body, which is more common among girls and women. Girls are told to suppress rage or any expression of anger at all. Boys are encouraged to express rage while simultaneously told it is bad. While women attempt suicide more often, more men commit suicide (American Foundation of Suicide Prevention).
Suicide is a form of violence that our society has yet to adequately address and as healers we must recognize the early signs of self-harm. 18 Rage is a defense against vulnerable emotions such as grief, shame and fear. As healers we cannot be afraid of rage. Of course we need to ensure our own physical safety as well as that of others working with us. There are basic steps we can take to minimize risk. Allow men-tees to feel entitled to their rage. If we can safely allow the expression of rage, then we can get into the deeper issues affecting the men-tee.
Tapping into these vulnerable feelings may incite more rage initially. It is critical to stay calm, show understanding and allow the client to express their rage. Once one starts tapping into the deeper issues hidden underneath the rage, which inevitably reveals feelings of devaluation, erosion of community and dehumanized loss. When the men-tee starts to recognize the origins of their rage, we healers must use this opportunity to introduce pro-social activities that can re-channel rage such as sports, hobbies, music, social activism, etc.
Historical Trauma
In this section we examine some of the policies and practices that are used to discriminate against and assault African-Americans and other marginalized groups. Our focus is specifically on state violence or state sanctioned violence against marginalized peoples. From chattel slavery to its modern day equivalents, we examine the ideological factors required to create and enforce oppression. We then come to our modern prison system and explore its relationship to chattel slavery using the 400 years of inequality project by Dr. Mindy Fulilove at The New School Center for New York City Affairs. As we explore violence we look at our history:
America was built on the deaths of Africans and Indigenous peoples. It is estimated that the violence of slavery caused tens of millions of African deaths. While the numbers vary based on different historical research, Africans were a critical piece in building American wealth. Africans provided the labor necessary to build this new country. Indigenous peoples had to be removed from their lands to make way for the new European settlers. Indigenous populations were wiped out of the Americas with estimates ranging from 80-100 million native deaths. Genocide was the tool that built America. War, displacement, disease, the slaughter of indigenous peoples and the destruction of their societies opened up the land for settlement and exploitation of resources. Violence has remained a critical component of American culture. Violence pollutes all aspects of our society. The first American 12-reel film- Birth of a Nation by D.W. Griffith- depicts enslaved Africans as barbaric, stupid and sexually aggressive towards white women. These stereotypes still are present in the American psyche today and have influenced the stereotypes of African Americans and been used to justify their continual enslavement.
It is precisely the criminalization of people of color that provides the justification for incarceration, enslavement and genocide. American culture glorifies violence in video games, television, music, sports, magazines, literature and in our history books. We look at lynching, where public displays of dead black and brown bodies were normal during Jim Crow. During this period, attending a lynching was considered entertainment like going to see a baseball game. Then we look at the Milgram and Zimbardo experiments to understand how “normal” people are encouraged to be violent and abusive to others. We also examine the social factors that lead to such behavior. Understanding how other groups have been marginalized and oppressed is critical to understanding societal devaluation and how these systems conspire to hurt and divide us. We look at the similarities and differences in how Chinese, Japanese, Mexicans and women of all ethnicities have been “othered” and abused.
We challenge healers to think about the relationship between state violence and domestic violence. We look at how we as a society are complicit in mass violence. Finally in this first semester, we explore youth led contemporary social movements. We look at income inequality and how it relates to racism, sexism, class-ism, able-ism and environmental injustice. We challenge healers to think about justice: what it means to create social change and discuss - what are the most effective ways for us to heal our society from injustice, because injustice is violence
Understanding our Pedagogy
Restorative practices is a field of study that has the potential to positively influence human behavior and strengthen civil society around the world. Restorative practices builds healthy communities, increases social capital, reduces the impact of crime, decreases antisocial behavior, repairs harm and restores relationships INCMI pedagogy is rooted in using restorative justice practices and interactive learning to support participants in engaging deeply with the material and each other.
The Circle
Indigenous cultures from around the world and community organizations that have spawned from their creation to address the needs of a particular group or area have gathered their communities in circles for all occasions. Celebrations, conflict resolutions, decision-making, story-telling and relationship building are some reasons why these indigenous societies would Circle. The Circle itself reflects the principles in which these societies operated where every member of the community is equal and connected. The Circle assumes a universal wish to be connected to others in a positive way. These ancient traditions believed no one can be “thrown away”. Every person, every creature, every object is connected. These principles not only embody justice and equality, these societies believed in the strength of the collective. Every member of the community has something valuable to contribute. Shared mutual respect for all things living is integral to a healthy world and to an effective restorative practitioner.